🔥POW-20 Protocol
POW-20 protocol is an extension of BRC-20 protocol that introduces and requires proof-of-work (PoW) to mint and produce new tokens.
Introduction
Proof-of-Work is the backbone of Bitcoin (BTC) and other PoW chains like Litecoin (LTC), Doge (DOGE), Bitcoin Cash (BCH), Bitcoin SV (BSV), etc. However, derivative assets (tokens/NFTs) like BRC-20 that run on these base layers have traditionally been issued or distributed through means other than PoW. While Atomicals recently enabled a version of PoW token mining, it does so at a cost, namely understandability for the average person and a learning curve to get started. It's fairly complex if you're not a dev. It also introduces challenges for exchanges and indexers that may wish to implement them.
What is needed is something simple that "extends" what we already have with BRC-20, making it easy for users, exchanges, and indexers to get started or implement with a few lines of code.
The protocol is straight forward and should look familiar.
Deploy
New Fields
difficulty: The number of leading zeros required in the double sha256 hash of the solution
startBlock: Any future block number
icon (optional): a reference inscriptionId or link to the icon
Mint
New Fields
solution: A unique string that is double sha256 hashed to meet the difficulty specified in the deploy inscription
A solution is composed of 4 parts delimited by a colon:
TICK - The ticker symbol
BTC_ADDRESS - The BTC ordinal address that the inscription is inscribed to (to prevent mempool sniping)
START_BLOCK_HEADER - The future block header/hash of the
startBlock
specified in the deploy inscription (to prevent pre-mines)NONCE - A random nonce
Transfer
New Indexer Rules
Is the address the same address found in the inscription? Must be
true
Does the solution contain the correct
START_BLOCK_HEADER
header for thestartBlock
found in the deploy inscription? Must betrue
Does the double sha256 hash of the solution meet the
difficulty
found in the deploy inscription? Must betrue
Has the solution been seen before? Must be
false
Examples
Valid Deploy:
Valid Mint:
The double sha256 hash of the above solution produces the following hash which meets the example deployment difficulty requirement of 3:
Valid Transfer:
Invalid Mint:
The double sha256 hash of the above solution produces the following hash which does NOT meet the deployment difficulty requirement and is invalid:
NOTE: The above protocol applies to all layer-1 chains other than BSV which implements an sCrypt Hash-to-Mint (HTM) smart-contract for BSV-20(v2) token issuance based on provided proof-of-work.
Last updated